Content-length: 18718 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 #18 A Report on the Crop Circle Making Demonstration given by Jim Schnabel at Pentlow, Nr. Sudbury, Suffolk, on July 3rd, 1993.


The Thin Reaper

A Report on the Crop Circle Making Demonstration given by Jim Schnabel at Pentlow, Nr. Sudbury, Suffolk, on July 3rd, 1993.

by Anthea Holland. C.C.C.S.


It was a hot, do-nothing kind of day. A day in which dogs panted on porches and cats languished on garden walls. A day in which Jim Schnabel cavorted in a corn field.

Well, not cavorted, exactly. In fact he struggled under a hot summer sun and strained against the handle of a garden roller in an effort to make a crop formation worthy of a professional hoaxer.

The day had been organised by Montague Keen, agronomist for the CCCS. Jim Schnabel, at a talk to the Essex Crop Circle Studies Group, had been asked (or was it challenged?) by Monty to visit his farm in Pentlow, Suffolk, and create a formation which could then be studied by the experts.

The names of those gathered expectantly to await Schnabel's arrival were synonymous with the crop circle world: Busty Taylor, pilot and photographer, one of the "originals"; Lucy Pringle, "Human Effects" expert and CCCS council member; Stanley Morcom and his wife, Suzy, both familiar faces where crop-circlers are gathered together; Jo Holland and Una Dawood, both well known to all those circle enthusiasts who descend on Beckhampton from spring to autumn, and last, but not least, a character known as "Bill Bailey", another (in)famous figure in the Circlefaking world.

Schnabel arrived late, and who could blame him ? The later the start, the further the sun from its zenith and the less uncomfortable his job would be. Or could it have been because (as someone suggested) a late arrival creates a more dramatic entrance ?

Schnabel had previously announced that he would probably attempt a similar formation to last year's Silbury Hill "charm bracelet" and some people had taken this to mean that he intended to create a replica. Their disappointment when he said that this was not his intention was obvious and seemed, to some, to prove their theory that Schnabel's claims to have created the "charm bracelet" were false.

Armed with a small rucksack, a few white tubular posts and a plastic garden roller (which, surprisingly enough, did not melt in the heat) Schnabel entered the field, climbed to the brow of the hill and began his work. Peter Sorenson, armed with video recorder, accompanied Schnabel throughout the day and recorded dutifully his every move.

The view from the lawned area where most of us sat was poor, and we contented ourselves with general discussions and chat. There was, however, a tubular framed viewing/video platform, from which a much better view could be obtained. From the ground it was possible to see the crab-like movements used by Schnabel as he formed the thin circle which was to link the various "charms", and it was interesting to note how many times he took the diagram of his planned creation from his pocket to check on his next course of action. (A point to note - this would probably need a torch in the hours of darkness !).

Throughout the day it became apparent that the "audience" was made up of a real cross section of Circle Watchers. There were some who thought that all crop circles may be man-made but felt that that in itself constituted a phenomenon; others who believed that although some were man made there were still a large number formed by other means; and some present obviously believed that all crop circles were created by outside forces and seemed totally unprepared to believe the claims of any who professed to have been instrumental in creating any of them at all. This latter group hardly deserved to be referred to as "investigators" as their tunnel vision must prevent them from accepting any evidence contrary to their personal beliefs. Indeed, one of them was overheard to express the desire that she hoped the real circle makers were watching and would strike Schnabel down.

In the course of the afternoon we were kept refreshed with cold drinks and, later, cups of tea. Meanwhile, "Bill Bailey" bemoaned his lack of fame and showed snapshots of impressive formations in Northamp-tonshire which he claims to be the creation of his team. Presumably he was hoping to pick up (or maybe pass on ?) a few tips.

It was early evening but still swelteringly hot, when Schnabel made his way from the field, his boyish, normally pale face red with exertion and the sun.

By this time we had already been informed by those on the viewing platform that the formation included a garden roller and a UFO and we eagerly made our way up the tramlines and into this new formation.

At first sight, it could only be described as "rough". However, it must be remembered that the crop was still green and was over six weeks earlier than the crop at Silbury Hill when the "charm bracelet" was formed last year.

There was some evidence of layering but little more than would occur naturally, and a bunch of flattened crop had fallen across the standing corn - an event which would, in normal investigation, point to a hoax. There were some right angled turns, not common in formations, in which the corn had been forced to follow the angle and had subsequently broken. The white, dust-like substance found on the stalk of the corn was obliterated in places, presumably where it had been trodden on, but further investigation showed it also to be missing from some of the undisturbed corn.

Before heading off for a, no doubt, welcome shower, Jim answered a few questions, mainly put to him by Grant Wakefield (keeper of the much worshipped "East Field" at Alton Barnes). Things got a little heated until Montague Keen intervened, pointing out to Wakefield that the afternoon was "not a confrontation". Wakefield reluctantly backed off and Montague Keen hustled Schnabel away.

In this investigator's view the day provided a wonderful opportunity to bask in the sun and enjoy the company. The experiment, though interesting, was inconclusive, proving only, to me at least, that yes, Jim Schnabel may have hoaxed the events to which he lays claim, particularly given more time (he had spent only three and a half hours in the field on this occasion), less pressure and one or two willing helpers.

Anthea Holland, Clacton-on-Sea.


Then Came Ken Brown

A Study of the Cheesefoot Head Pictograms

by Matthew Lawrence


I first became interested in crop circles in 1986 when my father and I were driving back from Petersfield one evening along the A272 and through the Cheesefoot Head area. Passing the car park and looking down into the now famous Devils Punch Bowl I was amazed to see two flattened, ringed depressions in the cornfield below us. We stopped the car and took several photos before returning home.

The impression this left in my mind at the tender age of 14 was incredible, so much so that I knew I wanted to get more involved with the phenomenon in the future, but it wasn't until four years later, when I had passed my driving test, that I got the chance to investigate the subject in any depth.

In my eagerness to see the circles when they were fresh and not damaged by admirers, I started to visit Cheesefoot Head first thing in the morning from around the beginning of May 1990, just before going to College in Winchester. It was on these morning runs that I started to meet all the main researchers who were doing similar sorties around this area.

These included Richard Andrews, Busty Taylor and George Wingfield, but it wasn't until the appearance of the first circle in the Punch Bowl that I met Pat Delgado and Colin Andrews. I found this circle very impressive and wanted to go down into the field to get a closer look, but Pat and Colin advised me against this, warning that the land owner would not welcome my presence. I took their advice and visited the circle at night and under the cover of darkness measured the circle with my good friend Nigel Beckett.

A few days later I decided to show a few of my other friends the giant Doughnut circle and was driving up the road from the Percy Hobbs pub when we noticed a massive crowd of people standing by the side of the road at Chilcomb Farm. Pulling up behind a BBC film crew's van we ran up to the boundary fence to see what all the fuss was about. Looking over we could hardly believe our eyes - there was an amazing pattern in the field, and unlike any previous ones this one had pathways and boxes ! Our first impressions were "its got to be man-made", but my thoughts were changed when Pat Delgado later walked out from inside the circle and proclaimed it "genuine". I have great respect for Pat and his judgement of the circles, after all he's been researching them longer than almost anyone else in the business.

After all the fuss had died down Nigel and myself started to measure and observe the formation. We noticed a few odd details. Between the boxes and central path were a few bent stems of crop which seemed to show where someone had walked into each box. We ignored these putting them down to all the people who were visiting the circle. Another thing we noticed was that each box measured four feet in width and had a strip of crop running down one edge in the opposite direction of flow to the rest of the ox.

Just as we were about to leave the formation an old fellow with a 'cine 8' camera walked in filming. His name was Doug Bower and he said he was a sound recordist of wildlife and had spotted the pattern from the road. After chatting about crop circles in general and asking us what we thought had caused this pattern he drove off and left us. This was May 23rd, the same day that the formation had been discovered.

On 24th May Pat Delgado rang to inform me of a new circle at Morestead, near Cheesefoot Head. Nigel and myself visited the circle later that day and it was here that Nigel discovered some underlays of corn coming from the tramlines to the circle centre and back out from the centre to the edge of the circle underneath the main flow of corn. We both accepted these as part and parcel of a genuine circle as we had heard them mentioned briefly by the "experts".

Over the next few months I discovered several circles in the Cheesefoot Head area and found similar dimension correlations involving four foot pathways and rings and similar ring and box spacings and underlays. I also met Doug Bower and his friend Dave Chorley on numerous occasions. They had the canny knack of showing up just after the circles had appeared - give or take a day or two.

On one occasion I visited Cheesefoot Head at approximately 11.00 pm. to measure up some recent formations and to my surprise found Doug and Dave near the Punchbowl. When I told them I had come to measure some circles in the dark due to problems with land owners they wished me luck and departed after talking to me for half an hour or so about tales of UFOs that people had related to them in connection with the circles.

Through my involvement in the crop circle scene, Nigel and myself became members of a local group called the Cheesefoot Head Monitoring Group - a silly name as only Nigel and I seemed to go up there on a regular basis ! I found the views in this group interesting but realised that they really only wanted to talk about UFOs and "cover-ups". It was only when Ken Brown joined the group in late 1990 that I found someone who I could relate to in terms of their views about the phenomenon. As far as I was concerned he brought in some northern down-to-earth thinking and sanity that the group needed to keep its feet on the ground.

1991 started with a bang at Cheesefoot Head with the second "laddergram" of the year on Chilcomb Down fields. I discovered this formation at approximately 6.00 am on 7 June and was almost certainly the first to enter it due to heavy rain and mist keeping people from firstly, seeing it very easily and secondly, getting soaked by entering the field.

After taking a few photographs outside the pattern I walked into the large ring and was surprised at what I found. There was a very obvious "stepping" effect around the edges of the circles and rings and also several broken stems especially around the edges and centres, but most of all in the ladder section which, although complicated in flow directions, was quite rough in places (not "undamaged" as told by the "experts").

I also noted that the magic four foot dimensions were present in all pathways and indeed some of the circles seemed to have multiples of four as their dimensions, but not always. Mud was also on the surface of some of the crop.

I brought up this dimension consistency on numerous occasions at crop circle meetings but seemed to be wasting my time as everyone else had gone metric and had not noticed ! So I decided that the "circle makers" used Imperial dimensions; that was the extent of my theory.

Then came Ken Brown.

Ken had also noticed the underlays and consistencies that I had found, but by the end of 1991 - just days before Doug and Dave went public - Ken had formulated a much more terminal theory from the same evidence, so by the time the Doug and Dave story broke he was 100 per cent sure they were telling the truth, and after I had seen the research Ken had done into their story, so was I. The fact that I had seen them up there on so many occasions just after circles had formed was almost enough to convince me alone.

The nail in the coffin was the second "flower" pattern at Cheesefoot Head. I studied Technical Drawing to "A" Level and knew straight away when I saw this flower pattern how it had been constructed and what a "cock-up" had been made of it. With the radius dimension being measured incorrectly the creators had stepped the distance around the circumference of the circle and discovered that the points did not meet where they should have done, thus creating thin arcs between several petals. This formation also had the characteristic stepping effect on its rings and "signatures" and also several underlays for which Ken has a detailed model.

So it appears that Doug and Dave are telling the truth about the circles in the Cheesefoot Head area. As far as circles in other areas I cannot comment as it doesn't look that good for any other pictograms wherever they may be.

As for plain circles, if they have underlays or stepped patterns I would be very suspicious of human origin.

Do "genuine" crop circles exist ? We may never find out.

Matthew J. Lawrence, Winchester


Home. Previous. Next.